Stop harassing human rights defender of South Gujarat for complaining to National Human Rights Commission

Adivasi Kisan Sangharsh Morcha activists next to Vyara police station in South Gujarat

In a letter to AK Parashar, National Focal Point-Human Rights Defenders, and Joint Registrar, National Human Rights Commission, Henri Tiphagne, Honorary National Working Secretary, Human Rights Defenders Alert – India*, has appealed for action on “harassment and intimidation” of tribal rights activist and human rights defender Romel Sutariya by Gujarat police of Chhotaudepur Police station, district Chhotaudepur, Gujarat. Excerpts from the letter:

We are writing to express our grave concern regarding the intimidation and harassment of tribal rights activist and human rights defender Romel Sutariya, president of tribal farmers’ organization, Adivasi Kisan Sangharsh Morcha (AKSM), Gujarat, by Gujarat Police of Chhotaudepur police station, district Chhotaudepur, Gujarat. The defender is being harassed and facing reprisal for filing a complaint to National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) regarding illegal sand mining in Chhotaudepur district with the support of police administration and local politicians.

Romel Sutariya is president of tribal farmers’ organization, Adivasi Kisan Sangharsh Morcha (AKSM) based in Vyara City of Tapi district in Gujarat. Romel has been actively participating in the people’s struggles at the grassroots level from the age of just 16. In 2013, Romel took up the cause of sugarcane farmers of Tapi district who were being exploited by the sugar-making cooperative companies falling in semi government sector. Sugarcane farmers were suffering financially due to nonpayment of their dues.

After one year of working with sugarcane workers, Romel, along with his fellow social activists, formed a unit of AKSM on June 18, 2014. Since then AKSM has been fighting for the land and forest rights of tribals of southern Gujarat. AKSM has been spearheading a campaign against illegal sand mining in the district, which is adversely affecting the water and land rights of the tribals.

Romel has also filed a complaint in the NHRC regarding the involvement of police and ruling politicians in supporting illegal sand mining. AKSM has gradually made its influence in other districts also. AKSM and Romel are being dubbed as “Naxalites” and they are being targeted for their human rights activities especially for defending land and forest rights of the poorest of poor tribals.

According to sources, police sub-inspector BD Shah along with another policeman of Chhotaudepur police station came to Vyara police station in Tapi district. They sent a policeman to the office of Romel to bring him to the police station. When Romel refused to go with him, then police sub inspector BD Shah came to Romel’s office and told him that they are conducting an enquiry on the complaint filed by Romel in the NHRC. They would like to record his statement on the matter. The police sub-inspector wanted Romel to give documentary proofs to substantiate the allegations he made in his complaint to NHRC on December 28, 2014 with complaint No 158/60/2015.

Romel mentioned two cases in his complaint to NHRC:

(1) In November 2014 the villagers of Chadeja village of Chhotaudepur were protesting against the sand mining work around their village under an allotted lease. During the protest a constable told the media that the lease was in the name of a Deputy Superintendent of Police. He also asked people to end the protest.

Under the 73rd amendment of the Indian Constitution which provides for panchayat control over common resources, village land use for mining purpose requires permission or consultation or agreement from the village panchayats or the gram sabha in and around the village under which a proposed mining area is to come up. In his complaint to NHRC, Romel mentioned about an existing nexus between police, civil administration and ruling politicians behind the indiscriminate and rampant sand mining in a large number of wetlands, especially rivers, of Chhotaudepur and Tapi districts of South Gujarat that was responsible for local tribals’ alienation from their land and other natural resources.

(2) In the second case Romel mentioned about his illegal detention on December 20, 2014 under section 68 of IPC by the police in Chhotaudepur. On December 20, the Gujarat Chief Minister was to inaugurate am Agriculture Festival in Chhotaudepur. Romel and other activists were made to remain in police station from morning 7.30 am till 3 pm. When he asked for the reason of his arrest, he was told by the police that intelligence report had revealed that they were planning to organize a protest against the chief minister’s visit so they were taken into custody.

On August 23, 2015 Romel received a notice signed by the Police Inspector, Local Crime Branch (LCB), Chhotaudepur police. The notice came through Vyara police station, district Tapi asking him to produce documentary evidences to verify his allegations that police and local politicians are involved in illegal sand mining in the region. The second notice he received on September 1, 2015 asking him to reply within two days. Romel sent a written reply to the Director, National Human Rights Commission of India and Director General of Police, Gujrat. On September a policeman from Vyara police station came to Romel office in Vyara and told him the officials from Chhotaudepur police want to record his statement. After Romel refused to go to Vyara police station, BD Shah, police-Sub inspector, Chhotaudepur police station, came to him and asked him to produce the documents. Romel told him that he had sent his written reply to NHRC and DGP, Gujrat police. Police sub-inspector refused to accept his version and insisted him to produce the documents.

The human rights defender Romel Sutariya is being continuously harassed by the local police for complaining to NHRC. The defender has been targeted in the past also. Police have filed cases against him on February 26, 2015 under sections 143, 144, 147, 106, 332, 337, 120 B, 506 (2) and 504 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). On February 18, 2015 he was booked under section 506 and 12 of IPC. On April 28, 2015 morning, Romel was picked from his office in Vyara by a police team led by inspector SL Bhatt of Vyara police station.

Police refused to tell Rome’ about the charges or offences for which he was picked up. He was also not permitted to call his family or his lawyer. Even his colleagues were not told where he is being taken. Later he was taken to the office of tehsildar who sent him to judicial custody by violating the due procedure of law. According to the legal procedure a tehsildar without the permission of sessions court is not authorized to send someone to judicial custody. Case was registered against Romel under sections 151 and 107 of CrPC. Mr. Rome was denied bail in a chapter case by the executive magistrate and he was asked to produce a solvency certificate and surety bond of 25,000. He was sent to Vyara sub-jail where he was detained for five long days and kept in jail illegally. He was neither given water nor food in the jail. He was harassed in custody. Finally, Romel was granted bail on May 4 by the session’s court of Vyara. Various false charges have been brought against Romel in order to harass him and prevent him from doing his legitimate human rights work.


We, therefore, urge you to immediately take necessary steps, conduct an independent investigation considering that the HRD is facing reprisal for approaching NHRC and also to ensure that the Superintendent of Police and the District Collector and District Magistrate of Chhotaudepur Distric. Our demands:

  • Order an immediate, thorough, transparent, effective, independent and impartial investigation into the harassment of Romel;
  • Take immediate action on the perpetrators, in this case police personnel of Chhotaudepur police station of Chhotaudepur district, Gujarat for harassing human rights defender Mr. Rome. Sutariya and using all provisions of law to ensure that the defender is not harassed in future
  • Guarantee in all circumstances the physical and psychological integrity of Romely:
  • Ensure provision of compensation, apology to the defender for the psychological sufferings he underwent because of the undue harassment and provide a re-assurance of not engaging in such acts against HRDs such as Romel Sutariya;
  • Put an end to all acts of attack and harassment against all human rights defenders like Romel in the State of Gujarat to ensure that in all circumstances they carry out their activities as defenders of human rights without any hindrances;
  • Takes steps to conform to the provisions of the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on December 9, 1998, especially: (a) Article 1, which states that “everyone has the right, individually and in association with others, to promote and to strive for the protection and realisation of human rights and fundamental freedoms at the national and international levels”; and (b) Article 12.2, which provides that “the State shall take all necessary measures to ensure the protection by the competent authorities of everyone, individually and in association with others, against any violence, threats, retaliation, de facto or de jure adverse discrimination, pressure or any other arbitrary action as a consequence of his or her legitimate exercise of the rights referred to in the present Declaration”;
  • Recommend urgently and speedily during the pendency of this complaint, the SHRC in Gujarat to also take necessary steps to establish a state focal point for HRDs in order to ensure that HRDs have a new protection mechanism in their own state;
  • Recommend urgently and speedily during the pendency of this complaint, the SHRC in Gujarat to convene meetings of all state human rights institutions in the state [women, minorities, right to information, disability, children etc. to ensure that a coordinated strategy is developed within the State of Gujarat for the protection of the rights of human rights defenders;
  • Recommend urgently and speedily during the pendency of this complaint, the State Government of Gujarat in collaboration with the NHRC Focal Point on HRDs and the State Human Rights Commission (SHRC), Gujarat, to provide sensitization training to law enforcement and security forces on the role and activities of human rights defenders as a matter of priority, with technical advice and assistance from relevant United Nations entities, NGOs and other partners;
  • Recommend urgently and speedily during the pendency of this complaint, the State Government of Gujarat in collaboration with the SHRC, Gujarat to publicly acknowledge the importance and legitimacy of the work of human rights defenders, i.e. anyone who, “individually and in association with others, … promote[s] and … strive[s] for the protection and realization of human rights and fundamental freedoms at the national and international levels” (Art.1 of the Declaration on Human Rights Defenders);
  • More generally, ensure in all circumstances the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and with international human rights instruments ratified by India is strictly adhered to in the state of Gujarat.



One thought on “Stop harassing human rights defender of South Gujarat for complaining to National Human Rights Commission

    President: Dr.R.K.D.Goel
    Address:1414-A,Akashdeep Soc.,b/h Akaswani, Makarpura Rd.,Vadodara 390 009
    OUR MOTTO: – To achieve 3rd vision of Dr. A .P. J. Abdul Kalam Hon’ble President of India.
    To see India economically, militarily strong among developed countries so we may not to
    Beg, borrow and bow before world

    Ahmedabad, 15 April, 2009
    Last Muslim Lok Sabha MP from Gujarat was in 1984
    A Muslim MP in Lok Sabha from Gujarat?

    Well, that has not happened for last 25 years, that’s a quarter of a century time. Gujarat’s last Muslim MP was elected in 1984 on Bharuch seat. Senior Congress leader and Congress president Sonia Gandhi’s political advisor Ahmed Patel had won Bharuch consequently for third time then. He had won the Bharuch seat in 1977 and 1980 too earlier. But after three victories in row, Ahmed Patel lost Bharuch in 1989 and 1991 Lok Sabha elections. In 1991 Janata Dal’s Muslim candidate Sheikh Ayesha Begum also lost miserably on Ahmedabad seat. In 1996, Congress candiate Irshad Mirza lost Ahmedabad seat. In 1998, Congress candidate Iqbal Kakuji lost Bharuch seat. In 2004 elections, Congress candidate Mohammad Fansiwala was defeated on Bharuch seat by his BJP rival. In 2009 Lok Sabha elections, Congress has put up Aziz Tankarvi, editor of Gujarati daily ‘Gujarat Today’ as a candidate from Bharuch. This has met with stiff resistance from within the party. Over a 100 party workers have joined the BJP. Bharuch is central Gujarat’s tribal dominated district where BJP has chosen a tribal sitting MP as a candidate. Muslims form a second strong block of voters in Bharuch. from 1960 to 1984, Gujaratis (both Hindus and Muslims) were liberal. Johraben Chavda, a Muslim candidate from Congress won Banaskantha seat, while in 1977, Ehsan Jaffri won Ahmedabad seat. Thus from 1960 to 2009, Gujarat has seen three muslim Lok Sabha members In Photo:Ahmed Patel No Feedback received to “Last Muslim Lok Sabha MP from Gujarat was in 1984” 1.Dr.R.K.D.Goel Says: Your comment is awaiting moderation.
    April 15th, 2009 at 12:18 pm P.T.O. for Dr. Goel’s comments
    Comp. File: Riots of Vadodara

    Dear Mr. Ahmed Patel, MP
    Why you are helping Mr. Chinnam Gandhi in all his wrong doing in Vadodara. Due to Chnnam Gandhi who has been patronized by you, VADODARA CITY DEVELOPMENT GONE 50 years back.
    Mr. Chinnam Gandhi was expelled from the Congress but due to you he has again taken in the Congress party.
    All the Congress leaders of Vadodara told me that Chinnam Gandhi is a man of Mr. Ahmed Patel who is right man of Mrs. Sonia Gandhi nothing can’t be done against the activity of Gandhi.
    You knew the role played by Chinnam Gandhi in Post Godhra riots and genocide of Muslims in 2002.
    Chinnam is known the leader / slum mafia of Vadodara South Zone. due to Chinnam the and your backing the Slum dwellers of a biggest Masia Kans can’t be removed resulting the logging of rain water every year through out the Vadodara city and suffering of 15 lakhs population of Vadodara.
    See your visit to Masia Kans on 30.04.1998 after the complete demolition of illegal encroacher from a Natural Storm Water Drainage. Govt. of Gujarat even as a special case allotted ULC land to the Dholi Kui Slum dwellers but Chinnam Gandhi with your support don’t allow illegal encroachers to be removed from a biggest Kans of Vadodara.
    I have all the proof of your helping Chinnam Gandhi in his wrong doing in Vadodara for which Mr. Ahmed Patel is also responsible.
    Do you know how many anti-social elements are residing in the Slums of South of Vadodara having Security problem of Gujarat.
    Please don’t any more help Chinnam Gandhi in his wrong doing on the cost of health and safety of Barodians?
    Please read all my e-mails to you. I can prove what I wrote.
    Dr. R.K.D.Goel Vadodara
    Representative of 15 lakhs Baroda’s those suffering due to you and Chinnam Gandhi
    Comp File:Rights of Vadodara.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s