Publish white paper on subsidies given to all types of pilgrims, as also to religious functions and spots


The Minority Coordination Committee (MCC), Gujarat, has sent a letter* to the Union Home Ministry, on how efforts are being made by certain interested quarters to divide people on religious lines following the Government of India’s decision to stop the Haj subsidy. Text of the letter:

As we already know, 2 days back the Government of India abolished the subsidy given on Haj pilgrimage. However, little is known about the fact that over the last 3 years, Haj subsidy declined from Rs 750 crores to Rs 225 crores. In any case, the step is being widely propagated as a big saving from wasteful expenditure. Meanwhile, there have been attempts by interested quarters to give the step a communal overtone, which is worrying.

Here, we would like to focus your attention towards the expenditure on the types of religious subsidies that is being provided in the country.  These include:


We believe that state should not interfere in religious practices, which is a matter of personal choice and freedom. To quote a Supreme Court judgement, “The relationship between man and God is an individual choice. The state is forbidden to have allegiance to such an activity … Mixing state with religion is not constitutionally permissible.”

Article 27 of the Indian Constitution states, “No person shall be compelled to pay any taxes, the proceeds of which are specifically appropriated in payment of expenses for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination.”

In 2011’s Prafull Goradia v. The Union of India, the Supreme Court tackled the question of whether a Government grant funded by taxpayer money violates Article 27. The SC bench proclaimed that it would only amount to such a violation if a “substantial part of taxpayer money” is used to promote religious activity.

It said: “In our opinion Article 27 would be violated if a substantial part of the entire income tax collected in India, or a substantial part of the entire central excise or the customs duties or sales tax, or a substantial part of any other tax collected in India, were to be utilized for promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination. In other words, suppose 25 percent of the entire income tax collected in India was utilized for promoting or maintaining any particular religion or religious denomination, that, in our opinion, would be violative of Article 27 of the Constitution.”

The question arises whether one should focus on government spending on Haj pilgrims only, or on other places of pilgrim as well.

We urge you that the Government of India comes clean on this issue and impartially highlights its views in media, so that no religious angle is given to whatever the central government does, whether it is religious pilgrimage, religious festival, religious meeting, or funding of religious spots through state bodies. We insist on the publication of a white paper on expenditure so that the country can know about how much the government is spending on the promotion of which religion.

*Signed by Mujahid Nafees, Convener

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s